Ayushi Gupta, International Institute Of Information Technology, Hyderabad ayushi.gupta@research.iiit.ac.in PRIMARY
Raghavendra Ch, International Institute Of Information Technology, Hyderabad raghavendra.ch@research.iiit.ac.in
Kamalakar Karlapalem, International Institute Of Information Technology, Hyderabad , kamal@iiit.ac.in [ Advisor ]
Student Team: YES
D3.js
Plot.ly
Flask(Web framework)
Approximately how
many hours were spent working on this submission in total?
200 hrs
May we post your
submission in the Visual Analytics Benchmark Repository after VAST Challenge
2017 is complete? YES
Video
Video is attached with submission
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb6iIM_Btsk
Questions
1 – “Patterns of Life” analyses depend on
recognizing repeating patterns of activities by individuals or groups. Describe
up to six daily patterns of life by vehicles traveling through and within the park.
Characterize the patterns by describing the kinds of vehicles participating,
their spatial activities (where do they go?), their temporal activities (when
does the pattern happen?), and provide a hypothesis of what the pattern
represents (for example, if I drove to a coffee house every morning, but did
not stay for long, you might hypothesize I’m getting coffee “to-go”). Please
limit your answer to six images and 500 words.
ANSWER1:
To begin with the analysis of Lekagul sensor data, we first computed the total number of unique vehicles of each type ( cartype1 - 7487, cartype2 - 4717, cartype2P - 998, cartype3 - 3039, cartype4 - 1244, cartype5 - 817, cartype6 - 406). From this, we can infer that cartype1,cartype2, cartype3 are more in number than any other vehicle type. We categorize the repetitive patterns into two parts. The first part deals with individual car-id's and the second part deals with groups. By groups, we mean similar vehicle types or vehicles following a similar route with similar time.
PART1: INDIVIDUALS
1) In the given dataset, there are a total of 18708 unique vehicles (cartype1 - 7487, cartype2 - 4717, cartype2P - 998, cartype3 - 3039, cartype4 - 1244, cartype5 - 817, cartype6 - 406). We then found the vehicles entering the park more than once. There are a total of 5 vehicles entering more than twice in the park (6 vehicles entered twice).
a) 20154519024544-322 (cartype 2) (16 times) : This car-id is the one which entered the maximum number of times. It visited the preserve from June to October 16 times( June : 2 times , July : 5 times, August : 4 times, September : 4 times, October : 1 ). In each and every visit, this vehicle always followed same path. It always entered the camping location in the afternoon (around 15:00) and left the very next day at midnight and exited the preserve straightaway from there within 1 hour. The path traversed by this vehicle is shown in figure1.1.[In the figure shown, the thickness of the road is proportional to the traffic following through that route, blue path indicates the route which vehicle followed and orange color indicates road network within park.]
b) 20153712013720-181 (cartype 3) (4 times): This car-id always visited camping6 and followed the same path always. It always enters the camping location around 14:00 in afternoon and leaves the next day around 22:30. [figure1.2]
c) 20162904122951-717 and 20162027042012-940 vehicles also visited the preserve multiple times and visited one of the camping locations.
PART2: GROUPS
a) Finding the groups within the data requires an analysis of the vehicle type and the time spent by the vehicles on a route, the time spent in camping and the most common path followed by each vehicle type. For this part, we first draw a heat map where time is on the x-axis and the gate-name is on the y -axis [figure 1.3]. In this visual representation, the block that is red in color indicates a very high flow of traffic. This depicts that general-gate7 is the most heavily used gate from 7:00AM to 14:00PM along with general-gate2, general-gate1, ranger-stop0 and general-gate0.
2 – Patterns of Life analyses may also
depend on understanding what patterns appear over longer periods of time (in
this case, over multiple days). Describe up to six patterns of life that occur
over multiple days (including across the entire data set) by vehicles traveling
through and within the park. Characterize the patterns by describing the kinds
of vehicles participating, their spatial activities (where do they go?), their
temporal activities (when does the pattern happen?), and provide a hypothesis
of what the pattern represents (for example, many vehicles showing up at the
same location each Saturday at the same time may suggest some activity
occurring there each Saturday). Please limit your answer to six images and 500
words.
ANSWER2:
1) Figure 2.1 shows the count of vehicles in the preserve on a given date. June, July, August and September are the peak months and vehicle type 1,2 and 3 are more active (also more in number) compared to other vehicles. From figure 2.2 (count of vehicles check-in per month per gate) we can figure out that general-gate1 ,general-gate2, general-gate4, general-gate5, general-gate7, ranger-stop0, ranger-stop2 are the gates that are being visited maximum.
![]() |
![]() |
3 – Unusual patterns may be patterns of
activity that changes from an established pattern, or are just difficult to
explain from what you know of a situation. Describe up to six unusual patterns
(either single day or multiple days) and highlight why you find them unusual.
Please limit your answer to six images and 500 words.
1) Cartype4 vehicles are the only vehicles which visited gate3, gate5, gate6,ranger-stop3 and ranger-stop6 apart from 2P [Figure 3.2]. This was observed by using the following heatmap[figure 3.1].
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 –– What are the top 3
patterns you discovered that you suspect could be most impactful to bird life
in the nature preserve? (Short text answer)
The top three patterns that we found are :
1) The car with id '20155705025759-63' (cartype 3) seemed to be the most suspicious as it entered the park on 2015-06-05 and has been roaming inside the park since then. It's going from one camping location to another and has visited only a few set of gates (all the general-gates, camping and ranger-stop). The park security needs to check if there is any visitor still in the park staying there for longer duration. This vehicle duration of stay at camping location even goes upto 1 month.
2) From the dataset, we inferred that ranger-stop1 is meant to be visited only by 2P vehicles. However, on one particular day, (2015-07-10) there were a few set of vehicles (20152810102803-808 , 20152810102819-458 , 20152810102828-459 20152910102928-970 , 20152910102959-782 , 20153010103017-871 of cartype1) which visited ranger-stop1 and didn't check in gate2.
3) There is heavy traffic through the gates : 'general-gate7','general-gate2','general-gate1' and 'ranger-stop2, throughout the year and during the peak months in particular. Cartype 5 and 6, are going to certain set of gates only and they visited the preserve only once. Cartype 1,2 and 3 are the vehicles which are more in number than others and follow few routes only. Also we found that there are few set of vehicles of type 2P which only traversed on holidays based on US calender.